


Stay Informed
Empowering The Community
拉克雷斯塔 (La Cresta) 是位于加州西穆列塔的一个马术社区,坐落在圣罗莎高原的群山之中。该社区位于15号高速公路克林顿基思出口旁,是远离城市喧嚣的完美度假胜地。巨大的地块和定制的住宅设计吸引了众多潜在购房者。 拉克雷斯塔提供独特的生活体验,为居民提供至少5英亩的宽敞住宅用地,周围环绕着美丽的自然风光。享受乡村生活的宁静,同时受益于友好热情的社区。 在拉克雷斯塔拥抱自然之美,这里提供充足的空间和隐私。 在热情友好的社区中享受平和与宁静。拉克雷斯塔的大多数房产都能欣赏到连绵起伏的山坡美景。住在拉克雷斯塔有很多事情可做,特别是如果你热爱户外活动!活动包括山地自行车、骑马、自然小径徒步旅行。La cresta 也靠近克利夫兰国家森林和圣罗莎生态保护区,这使得这个社区成为在穆列塔购买房屋时值得考虑的一个地方。

Facts Members Should Know
URGENT
La Cresta POA Board of Majority Proposed 20% Assessment Increase
MEMBERS SPEAK to the issues of LCPOA governance
The LCPOA liabilities Issue
The Transparency Issues
Issues Members should be awared of
Financial
Lack of Transparence and Irresponsible spending
We are advocating for a return to standard transparency: ensuring all Board members have equal access to legal guidance and that members can review the documents they fund. Let’s prioritize administrative efficiency over litigation."
Horse Crosswalk & Signage
1
Lack of Financial Disclosure
-
Many financial statements have not been provided
-
Member document requests remain unfulfilled per Civil Code 5210
-
Potential compliance violations of corporate transparency with Davis-Stirling Act requirements
-
Members denied access to review necessary financial records to verify justification for proposed dues increase
2
Legal Expenditure Transparency
-
Funds are being depleted on legal disputes the Board has initiated against members and members have filed lawsuits for alleged Board violations.
-
Transparency Disputes: Legal expenses have increased due to management’s refusal to provide requested financial records and documentation.
3
Reserve Funding Requires Scrutiny
-
Lack of Supportive Data: No engineering studies, reserve analyses, or capital schedules have been provided to justify the recent discussion for a dues increase.
-
Unjustified Reserve Targets: The Board is pushing for 50%+ reserve levels, despite road maintenance historically covered by the annual operating budget.
5
Discretionary Project Spending
-
Ineffective Spending: Over $100,000 was spent on equestrian crossing with signage that no longer functions, is largely unused due to safety concerns on Avenida La Cresta.
-
Questions remain whether the Calle Centro/ALC crosswalk cost benefits the member majority or primarily serves the private commercial business interest of Board President Roy Paulson.
Majority of Board Misconduct
When a Board of Directors engages in misconduct or fails to act with the care and transparency required by law, they place the entire community at catastrophic financial risk. Most critically, Directors and Officers (D&O) Insurance policies frequently contain 'Conduct Exclusions. Failure to uphold fiduciary duties and follow CC&Rs—specifically regarding unauthorized mobile home approvals, the abandonment of cul-de-sac maintenance, and undisclosed reserve fund withdrawals—places the entire community at catastrophic risk. Such misconduct can trigger ...
Majority of Board Misconduct
1
Road Maintenance Obligation for vacated Cul-de-Sacs
-
On November 6, 2025, the Board majority passed a Resolution to prohibit any further discussion of cul-de-sac maintenance, despite member objections.
-
The Board’s refusal to maintain all roads contradicts the Association's responsibility of vacating 128 private roads, including 81 named cul-de-sacs.
4
LCPOA “Double Standard”: Higher Dues for Reduced Services?
-
Campaign Inconsistency: Members are questioning the contradiction between current Board actions and 2025 campaign promises made by Roy Paulson and David Boyd.
-
Unjustified Dues Increase: Despite successfully cutting cul-de-sac maintenance, the Board is now proposing a 20% dues increase, directly contradicting their campaign promises.
5
Governance Structure and Committee Participation
-
Discriminatory Appointments: Committee selections appear to prioritize political alignment over merit, violating fair and equal opportunity for all members to volunteer service.
-
Targeted Exclusions of Experts:
-
Director Ghafouri: Removed as Treasurer
-
Steve Brown: Removed as Chair of the Governing Documents Committee,
-
MDM Auger: Qualified election oversight application rejected despite professional experience as a Poll Worker and Inspector of Elections.
-
Tsun-I Wang: Application for the Architectural Committee denied despite formal architectural education.
-
ALL the above individuals are former Board Candidates or Board Members of differing political opinion.
-
9
Summary
-
Survey Purpose: Collecting member feedback on the proposed 20% dues increase and Board governance.
-
Member Action: Please review all financial records and governing documents before forming a final conclusion.
-
Member Participation is Essential: Your input is critical to ensuring transparency, accountability, and responsible governance in La Cresta.
We want to hear your voice
-
Were you aware that the LCPOA Board scheduled a vote on a 20% dues increase at a Special Meeting held February 20, 2026?
☐ Yes ☐ No -
Before the scheduled Board vote, were you provided detailed financial documentation explaining the need for a 20% increase?
☐ Yes ☐ No -
What is your primary concern regarding this proposed increase?
☐ Lack of financial detail
☐ Concerns of fiscal management
☐ No Concern